Arrived home this evening to find the puppy (nee "Shitpaws") had soiled her crate. But-but-but: She has progressed from her Shitpaws days! She didn't step in it and spread celebratory tracks all around her crate ... which is nice.
Once outside, though, I quickly realized this wasn't a potty-training relapse. She has acquired a bug (or, more likely, consumed a bad hit of yard 'shrooms) so that she -- as my southern college roommate would say -- "could shit through a screen door."
A couple more incidents later, and we diagnose that we have a problem. Sadly for her, our "solution" is to not feed her tonight and hope for the best. But dogs don't tend to buy the "but you've got the runs" argument for forced food deprivation. So she laid awkwardly at my feet all evening, only occasionally getting up just to flop back down with a dramatic sigh just a few feet away. This move allows her to reposition and announce a new accusatory gaze at me that says, "Is it time yet?"
The bad news is there will probably be more clean-ups tomorrow, and maybe a trip to the vet. The good news is her theatrics let me sort of capture her spine-contorting repose on film (above). Even if I had a spine that enabled my feet to face forward while my upper torso and arms faced backward, I don't see how that would be a preferred position. But then I don't know that I'd lay with my tail perilously close the rolling chair wheel just to protest feeding conditions, either.
Addendum: If you followed the old Shitpaws link, you should know her modest size leads us to doubt her shelter-billed part-Newfie lineage. Unless that "part" is about 5%. Or unless her Newfie parent was seduced by one smooth-talking miniature terrier mix after a long night of yard 'shrooms.
I'm already turned off by her "The Nanny"-esque voice, so I couldn't bear to watch Palin's speech. But I was still curious about what distortions and non-issues she used in the Grand Fight To Not Talk about Actual Policies (But War Records Are Lovely). So I looked at Palin's transcript and noticed that every reference to "nuclear" is spelled out phonetically: "new-clear."
For real! I noticed with colloquial amusement that she was a fan of "newk-u-lar" when she was first introduced to us non-Alaskans just six days ago, after the Chief Executive of A State That Borders Russia was named as the Woman To Shatter Ceilings before her off-limits family was paraded before the cameras. I chuckled but figured they might even like that, since it sounds all down-home and moose-hunter like -- an image they played up from Day 1. Never thought they'd coach her to change it.
But perhaps that pronunciation is too close an echo of W., the last person elected for his down-home charm and endearing ignorance. So her speechwriters changed it, spelling it out for her every time: new-clear. Elitists! Insisting she pronounce it as intended ... damn elitist GOP speechwriters...
But Let's Talk about Policy ... or Not I noticed in her speech she ripped the value of "community organizing" (which in non-affiliated GOP groups has already become code for "possible drug dealer?" the way "strict constructionist judge" has become code for "will overturn Roe!").
It is bewildering to me that we can have election after election built around these non-policy arguments and character assassination. On one hand Palin can accuse her opponents of being "elitist" and out-of-touch with "the common man," and in the next breath dismiss community organizing, which is the most fundamental, most difficult, back-breaking step in enacting change and happens to very much involve "the common man," as it is his only recourse. Wait, you had to reason with people and forge compromise among disparate interests to enact policies? You weren't just handed a seat through family name? That's no preparation for governing this country.
But why are we having this discussion to begin with? Oh, because policy discussions don't resonate, and in truth their policies have quite ugly results, according to the data of the last 28 years. If this were about policy, we could have the election today, because the tenets are already spelled out.
Meanwhile, I feel bad for the pregnant teenager, who for the good of the party must freely chooses at 17 to marry the baby-daddy, getting mixed into all of this. (Abstinence-only education works!) And that's great Palin still had her baby with Down Syndrome, but if you're pro-life (note: pro-prenatals only; soldiers, foreigners, immigrants, prisoners, poor need not apply) was there really a "decision" to brag about? God told you to have the f-ing baby!
Ah, but we are not to ask questions about her background or how her family is an example of her beliefs in action, because that is first, chauvinist; and second, she was chosen by a War Hero so what question is there?, and third, background scrutiny is to be reserved only for Democrats, whose foreign paternal background and questionable degree of love for Our Country demands careful, suspicious scrutiny.
For the person who doesn't have everything, but doesn't really want everything, but just buys what he needs/wants when he needs/wants it, m'lady found one more great surprise for me for my birthday: A sweet all-in-one telephoto lens for my year-old Nikon digital SLR camera. This one's a beauty because it lets you carry just one lens around, which is huge if you're lugging the camera around to begin with.
I've been too busy to really get down to exploring how to use it, but I took it to a recent family gathering (to zoom in on facial pores) and on my rushed Radiohead/Joshua Tree trip out west. So far so good.
At the in-law abode, I messed with it by lazily shooting hummingbirds at a feeder. Figured those spastic sugar-high wings would be a nice test for the zoom. It's really ridiculous, how digital SLRs have made taken half-way decent photos so easy. I still feel like I'm cheating, with equipment I don't deserve (Why yes, I was reared Catholic. Why do you ask?)
Though the first thing you discover when trying to shoot a hummingbird is: Screw the speed of their wings -- it's their bodies that move too damn fast! They're small, they appear in your periphery like bugs, and they zoom from hovering to zipping across your range in the, heh, blink of an eye. I had to point at the feeder and just hope for the best.
Anyway, a friendly wasp arrived, too, to partake in the sugarfest. Wasps always fascinate me, but lacking the courage, I'm not going to get close enough to really examine one.
So the lens served a purely practical role, as it allowed me to examine the sucker from afar. Zoom, shoot, then blow-up the image to inspect that funky body. Those long dangling legs, the big stinger that Freaked.Me.Out. as a kid, the seemingly not-meant-for-flight physique that will nonetheless nimbly navigate your flesh when perturbed.
In a very W.-esque assertion of "Trust Us: Father Knows Best," the McCain campaign -- or is it the RNC machine? I can't tell the difference anymore -- insists that it is not our place, we citizens of the democracy that He Puts First, to ask questions about Mrs. Palin's background and record. Somehow we're supposed to interview her for the position of second-in-command, but without probing into what she's been up to the last six years.
It's as if, because McCain assures us she was vetted for the choice -- even that is debatable -- we should just take it, shut up, and enjoy her turn as snarky celebrity venomist of the moment.
But it keeps coming up in conversation in my life, so I'm collecting links I liked or mentioned here:
** On the topic of what is "fair" to discuss about Palin, we have a rumination in the Washington Post about what GOP attack dogs would say was "fair" if it were Hillary Clinton in her shoes. We remember the '90s (not to mention her campaign this year), yes we do.
** Frank Rich, per usual, loaded his weekender with helpful background links on Palin, the double-talk of the campaign to deflect inquiries about her, and the "process" McCain used to choose her (the Party reactionaries simply wouldn't accept a pro-choicer from their self-appointed "maverick");
** Amusingly, a woman from the town of then-5,700 Palin mayored wrote a letter to friends that has now been shared everywhere, detailing one resident's view of what our would-be second-in-command's actions and policies are, versus what she said on the stump. NPR had a fun interview with the woman, bewildered that her dial-up email to old college friends now has her fielding calls from around the world.
** I'd been waiting on a piece like this: interviews with parents of children with special-needs on their reaction to her pandering to them in her speech. You now have an "advocate in the White House," she pledged. In the days that followed, of course, her spokespeople would not divulge what this advocacy would entail. Leveraging the stress and emotions of parents of the disabled may be one of the lowest forms of pandering; if she were to get into office and not back that up with tangible efforts on their behalf, she'd be earning a volcano of bad karma. Interesting that helping people like this is an example of the kind of community support -- pooling our resources to help disadvantaged people who could just as well be us, had fate been different -- that Obama pushes for but Palin otherwise dismisses.
** More in the realm of reality-turned-upside-down from Bob Herbert. And my favorite, from Paul Krugman -- who typically focuses on the economic side of things -- on the bizarre Orwellian juxtaposition of the RNC convention rich men rallying their base by channeling resentment toward the fabled "elites." Ah, it's rich.
I have some hope that Obama is our last chance at reversing the direction of politics to focus on something somewhat substantive. The challenge, as always, is turning substantive policy discussion into words that are not drowned out by knee-jerk, cynical appeals to patriotism, fear and controversy (his opposing party's specialty). He's even clarified and admitted regret over past statements in introspective ways that will surely be turned against him. If he were up against a candidate that had more fervent support from the GOP base, I doubt it would work. Even now, I fear it won't. But it's worth a shot.
And after days of tiptoeing around Palin, Obama even took his first direct swipe at the Alaska governor: “I know the governor of Alaska has been, you know, saying she is change,” Obama said at a town hall here. “But when you [have] been taking all these earmarks when it is convenient and then suddenly you are the champion anti-earmark person. That is not change, come on.
I mean, words mean something. You can’t just make stuff up.”
Oh yes you can. From Swift Boating to "I said no thanks to the Bridge to Nowhere," they do it all the time.
I have been chided by a long-distance follower to update or finish this spring's deck/sunroom story. I never updated the in-construction photos with "after" photos, even though we've been enjoying the addition all summer.
So here are the updated pics (they're on a new page) ... Now that I think of it, I guess I don't have a finished outside photo. Ack, that's just as well; we seem to have reached a decision-by-exhaustion to leave the landscaping and touch-ups for later ... or "next year" ... or something.
Actually, there is talk of window treatments, about which I am unenthusiastic. It makes sense in the end, but really I enjoy the room for its openness. When there's nothing to look at or take in through the windows, I go elsewhere anyway. So maybe, in true legislative style, I will try to tie a Landscaping amendment to the Treat Our Windows Now bill (known as the "T.O.W.N. USA" bill) that's currently awaiting a vote. That amendment would effectively sabotage the bill's passage until at least the next term.
Problem is, I'm the minority party here. I don't have the gavel, or a committee chairmanship. All I have is access to the intelligence data on window treatments. But the other side has access to the funds. And she knows people. If her party wants window treatments, she can make it happen with one phone call.
This summer, driving through ... somewhere between here and Appalachia, I was at a fast-food restaurant and ordered a drink with my meal. Accustomed to the time-saving DIY setup of fast-food fountain soda now, I just said "and a medium soda."
The cashier asked something that I didn't understand or hear right, so I had to ask her to repeat herself. Twice. Between the first and second repetition, a flush of mild embarrassment washed over me: "Wait, where are we and what do they call carbonated sugar drink here?" I thought. "What word did I use?"
Turns out it was just her accent. She just asked "What kind?" because at this burger joint they actually fill the cup for you (and keep refills closely regulated behind the counter).
But it reminded me of a map and study I saw, which is now replicated here, showing the regional differences in how we call pop, soda, sodie, coke, etc. I remember seeing an explanation/theory once about why we're an island of "soda" surrounded by "pop" and "coke," but I can't find it now.
I love, too, that this is the single-most reader-submitted map to that strange-maps site. We take our soda seriously, man.
Too much pain and, suffering, crying Too many, funerals, we know the Earth is dying Gatherers, celebrants, in a state of merriment This sickness, cleanse us, with fire and music
This tribal antidote--my choice Come to the great assembly: revelry, rejoice, rejoice, rejoice!
After the high that was this summer's Radiohead tour, I found myself in the same boat as someone who said after their 2003 shows: "That was incredible. After this, I'm not sure I can enjoy going to concerts anymore."
But I better snap out of it, because another favorite band's very rare, perhaps last tour (because you never know) soon beckons in this, my personal Year of the Show.
The first rule of a Killing Joke tour is, you need to make sure the band is likely to show before you depart home to see them. Rare is the Killing Joke fan who hasn't had at least one tough-to-reach show collapse on them. In 1996, their European tour just ... f a d e d ... away before they even got back to their home soil. So few fans have ever seen that tour/album's material performed live.
Lucky for me, on my cancellation journey in 2003, I at least got to bound around London with BH for my efforts.
But I was still understandably nervous about the upcoming fall tour, which includes New York and Chicago. They announced it in the spring -- with the reformation of their original lineup from 1979-82 -- but we haven't heard much since (An at-the-time pledged "new album" with the original lineup has dropped like a campaign pledge.).
Until now. The returning bass player, Youth, who's made more in his career as a producer and dance-techno maestro, shared details on MySpace. They've been rehearsing, and they're taking off to Tokyo now for the first stops on the tour. And all of the Gathering, as the die-hards are known, collectively exhaled. And pumped their fists.
Tomorrow I embark on a world tour with killing joke .Its the first time the original line up has performed for 26 years!I am going to attempt to keep blog up to give a diaryistic view from the inside of the storm!
I havent even had time to unpack from returning from Spain where we have been rehearsing for the past 3 weeks. I hit the ground running and have been locked in a south London studio all weekend completeing a new production .Its probably a good thing as the more i think about the tour the more excited i get!
Rehearsing invoked many emotions from pure joy and exhileration to utter terror and fear!
I feel very privilaged to have the opportunity to work with these incredably commited and talented artists. thts not to say the challange has been immense. Learning over 50 songs and rehearsing them untill they are white hot tight is no easy gig! However having Jaz Coleman's perfectionist zeal bearing down upon us upped the bar and enabled us to steel our metal as musicians vastly.Having Big Paul's presence within the circle again has given us a renewed primal force and a tribal/disco stomp last heard together in 1982! its hard to describe how im feeling but it feels exactly as it should ....strangly calm and super intense!
Rejoice! I've no idea what those 50 songs will entail. Even the 20-30 songs in their "standard" tour rotation make up a varied mix that hits everyone differently. This should be intense. I just hope they're still in one piece by the time they arrive in North America.
On our ski trip last spring, one guy arrived to the lodge late in the evening because he's a physicist who was flying back from CERN in Geneva (The ski trip with this crew is an epic trip, well worth the burden of travel and rearranging itineraries). CERN is where they've been building a rather pricey, rather lengthy, rather finely tuned piece of machinery to crash subatomic particles together in the hope of revealing still smaller subatomic particles.
When he showed up, the rest of us well into the evening's post-slope recovery, I took a little too much drunken delight in mockingly accusing him of trying to swallow Earth in a man-made black hole.
That amusing conspiracy theory/uninformed fear, and all of its tinfoil-headed adherents (just peruse the comments section of any news link), officially takes flight tomorrow, when they finally turn CERN's new super-duper-fradgelistic-collider on.
But in case the physicists are wrong, and the paranoid are right (we're watching you, so we already know), be warned: The world ends tomorrow.
So when you wake up, before you bother going into work, be sure and check the Internet to see if there's still a world to work in. And if you should wake up in a parallel universe, be sure and plant a flag there to claim it for America. Country First, and all.
The solar system's demise has been greatly exaggerated. I did not wake up yesterday as a singularity.
Actually, I neglected to mention that the new supercollider (that just sounds better to me than Large Hadron Collider), while being powered on yesterday, will not reach alleged apocalyptic power and speed until next spring. You've got six months to live, so make it count.
To prepare yourself, there are some helpful resources out there. (Actually, this is an honest list -- I'm not being all tongue-in-cheek here -- for friends who had questions that I, no physicist, do not answer well):
A great, concise overview of what the LHC is, with just a taste of "science talk," and what they hope it might discover. Might. A great thing about physics is it only gets weirder and weirder at the subatomic level, so no one knows what they'll learn; but it's a good bet it will be cool. And it's a very very good bet it won't create black holes that swallow us up.
But if it did, here is a nice Slate Explainer of what will happen to you should your demise come via black hole. Experience varies depending on the black hole's size. It's important you learn this now, since when it actually happens, you'll have little time to reflect on the experience, and even less time to write it down for the Archaeologists of Andromeda to find.
Here, a wonderful essay on how we determine and judge the odds and defensible risk of our own destruction in the name of discovery. I love this, because we NEVER have these Important Conversations on a societal level. Whether it's healthcare (and reasonable age expectancy vs. cost to achieve it), tax policy, environment, these discussions NEVER happen at the national democratic level. We instead fight about lipstick and who loves our country more.
That last link included that "Scientist's Prayer" from a Walker Percy story:
“Lord, grant that my work increase knowledge and help other men. Failing that, Lord, grant that it will not lead to man’s destruction. Failing that, Lord, grant that my article in Brain be published before the destruction takes place.”
Rough weekend in the Cult of Palin. But this being the 2000-oughts, it probably doesn't matter. She's "one of us" and she can [insert down-home cliche here].
Time for link-collecting, so I can look back on these strange days ...
There was the pretty hilarious, dead-on Tina Fey return to SNL to impersonate her, condensing into a few minutes of parody the most alarming parts of her candidacy. Sadly, that will probably me more significant for opinion-shaping than anything written anywhere.
And the rest of her interview with Charles Gibson was released -- her first non-scripted, non-staged public comments, which is rather undemocratic of a public official ... but then Bush has spent most of his presidency not answering questions, so perhaps indignant indifference is the new face of public service. She came off as a skilled politician, but not so strong in the "I know what's at stake" category. (e.g. Russians are "our next-door neighbors. And you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska. From an island in Alaska.” Cool! Vote her ass in!)
After a week of digging and talking to Alaskan colleagues and opponents, three Times reporters dug up a severely damning picture: Palin The Reformer looks like, well, any ol' Machiavellian crony-coddler:
An examination of her swift rise and record as mayor of Wasilla and then governor finds that her visceral style and penchant for attacking critics ... contrasts with her carefully crafted public image.
Throughout her political career, she has pursued vendettas, fired officials who crossed her and sometimes blurred the line between government and personal grievance, according to a review of public records and interviews with 60 Republican and Democratic legislators and local officials.
The story also reveals that she, like a good modern-era Republican, appears to believe her correspondence as a public official is her business, not the public's. We might ask her, but she wouldn't answer questions for the story. That's a good democracy. Which crony she picks and why is not of our concern, dude.
In the preaching-to-the-choir category, every non-conservative NYT op/ed writer took their turn sharing their bewilderment:
Herbert: "Palin’s problem is not that she was mayor of a small town or has only been in the Alaska governor’s office a short while. Her problem (and now ours) is that she is not well versed on the critical matters confronting the country at one of the most crucial turning points in its history."
Frank Rich, on why it doesn't seem to matter whether she's well versed on silly things like issues and policies that might keep Rome from declining: "The specifics have changed in our new century, but the vitriolic animus of right-wing populism preached by Pegler and McCarthy and revived by the 1990s culture wars remains the same. The game is always to pit the good, patriotic real Americans against those subversive, probably gay 'cosmopolitan' urbanites (as the sometime cross-dresser Rudy Giuliani has it) who threaten to take away everything that small-town folk hold dear."
The most salient, boots-shaking passage for me was from Maureen Dowd: "The really scary part of the Palin interview was how much she seemed like W. in 2000, and not just the way she pronounced nu-cue-lar. She had the same flimsy but tenacious adeptness at saying nothing, the same generalities and platitudes, the same restrained resentment at being pressed to be specific, as though specific is the province of silly eggheads, not people who clear brush at the ranch or shoot moose on the tundra."
Yes, that's what shook my faith in 2000! It's that "resentment at being pressed to be specific" that turns my stomach and sends shivers through my bones.
On Friday, Krugman showed exhausted disgust at the whole thing: "Why do the McCain people think they can get away with this stuff? Well, they’re probably counting on the common practice in the news media of being 'balanced' at all costs. You know how it goes: If a politician says that black is white, the news report doesn’t say that he’s wrong, it reports that 'some Democrats say' that he’s wrong. Or a grotesque lie from one side is paired with a trivial misstatement from the other, conveying the impression that both sides are equally dirty."
And Friedman, on the sheer idiocy and insincerity of McCain & company's "drill, baby, drill!": "Why would Republicans, the party of business, want to focus our country on breathing life into a 19th-century technology — fossil fuels — rather than giving birth to a 21st-century technology — renewable energy? As I have argued before, it reminds me of someone who, on the eve of the I.T. revolution — on the eve of PCs and the Internet — is pounding the table for America to make more I.B.M. typewriters and carbon paper. 'Typewriters, baby, typewriters.'"
Um, probably because they will die in the next 20-30 years and don't give a shit about the Earth beyond, as long as their retirement is well funded and golf courses hydrated? That's my guess.
Well, at least we'll reap what we sow. That should make good god*-fearing folk happy.
*Must be singular "god." Multiple gods-fearers need not apply.
Every weekend for several years, I've played hockey at the same rink housed in a county park. Each time, as I arrive in the morning, I see people jogging, walking their dogs, biking into the woods -- all in a hint that something very nice beckons beyond the offal-laden walls of the hockey rink.
But each week, after two hours of hockey, I'm too tired to explore, so I tell myself: "Some week, maybe next week, I'll bring the dogs and hike the trails."
Well that never happened, but with the rink under maintenance this past week, we played tennis at the park instead, so I brought the dogs, and afterward, I finally saw what Queeny Park has to offer. Turns out, it's pretty nice!
There are several trails -- none more than a few miles -- and they wind through the woods and up decent elevation so you feel like you've actually gone somewhere other than a parking lot in the middle of West County.
It was while walking these trails that I was shot by the realization that it's been a very, very long time since I've lost myself in the woods to just take it all in like that. There was a moment when we were walking ("we" being myself and the two panting canines, who'd already spent the morning chasing tennis balls) where all external sounds dropped away, and all I could hear was the saturating chirp and wheeze of crickets and their what-not relatives in the grass/tree-nesting family. For once -- for freaking once! -- no hint of the highways just a few miles away. On a fairly strong sunny day, we were sheltered under the cool canopy of the trees.
And I'm thinking, partly with shame: Man, the last time I gave myself the chance to stand immersed in the sounds and smells of the woods like this was probably almost 10 years ago on a winter hike at Trail of Tears (not many animal sounds in winter). There was a summer hike at Trail of Tears around the same time, but that was in the company of my then-girlfriend's family, so I couldn't fully get my Thoreau on.
But neither long-ago hike was as solitary and reflection-inducing as this, in a humble enclave of West County. That inescapable perk of being alone there, with no one to comment or respond to your thoughts -- only the dogs there to share life and oxygen but to stay obediently quiet.
It was so good, I'm embarrassed it's been so long. I annually hit the ocean, I hit the solitary snow-covered field, I hit the river (with alcohol and friends), but strangely not this.
A walk in the woods, baby. I should try it more often.
We caught "Burn after Reading" with a bunch of younger(!) teacher colleagues. Generally, I anticipate a new Coen brothers film release like a religious awakening (if I were into religious awakenings, that is). But I sensed from glancing at reviews that this one wouldn't be a full meal.
And it wasn't. I laughed hard several times, enjoyed generally solid acting performances and some good lines, but most of us agreed afterward it wasn't a movie you'd ever need to see again. And that's fine; it's just not how I usually feel about a Coen brothers film. Even the non-classics are worth revisiting. (One figures "Burn after Reading" refers not just to the film's light plot but also as a taunt from the Coens to their fans and movie-going public.)
My vote is that John Malkovich turned in the best performance. His subtler moments were refreshing restraint amid a cast of exaggerated characters. Brad Pitt does an earnest job conjuring up a caricature for his thin character, but even his made-for-laughs moments left me feeling flat half the time.
In that realm, the best acting moment may have been in the first few minutes, when Malkovich's CIA analyst character is called into his boss' office for -- he doesn't know this yet -- his firing. When asked if he knows the other suits in the room he says, yes-name-hi, yes-name-hi, "Olsen I know by ... reputa-..." and trails off. The delicacy with which Malkovich goes from standard B.S. meeting mode to realizing that this meeting is about him getting canned -- it's a great acting touch. You'd swear Malkovich spent his life in an office setting.
So I'm glad I went and got my healthy laughter in. But reviewers are confused if they think this compares with, or even attempts to reach, a "Big Lebowski" or "Raisin Arizona." Even "Fargo." Those films had at least some characters who were richer, had at least some redeeming qualities -- ones who were lovable or flawed but not purely one-dimensional greed and selfishness. Heck, even "Lebwoski's" neocon-incarnate Walter was a brilliant comic creation (and performance) who rivaled the star of that movie.
This one seems more like a silly one-off. A fun lark for all involved, one that's by no means as vacuous as so many bad comedy mill features that come out from SNL alumni. But not a film anyone would ever need on DVD, either.
The signs of aging, or just plain time advancing without us, are always beating us over the head (and tush), and written about as often as addiction. So it's fun to see a new angle, or just a nicely turned phrase.
It was nice to get this validation from the youth. Part of me thought, though, that we should do something along the lines of showing them How It Was Done, and get up to dance to “Billie Jean,” “The Breaks” or “Like a Prayer,” which were, after all, our songs. But another part of me was tired, having had a whole half glass of champagne over the course of the evening, and many other parts felt like they were being gouged by plastic flexicuffs, so tight and complicated were the supports holding my cantilevered body in place in my ambitious party attire.
Love it! I'm not a gracefully aging woman, but I know one or 20 and hear their voice.
Speaking of the march of time... Yesterday I stopped by Best Buy to get a replacement battery for my phone. Best Buy was on my route between home and Strip Mall Nirvana, and it was where I originally bought the phone five years ago. But they didn't have what I needed.
Here's why:
You might think I was looking for a cell phone battery, but I'm talking about my damned landline. A "cordless" phone that was once all the rage with all its mega and then gigahertz, and is now default, except among the growing legion of landline-less folk.
Somewhere along the line, between infrequent stops for a cheap DVD -- what, not bittorrenting movies yet? -- Best Buy stopped selling landline phones! As I crept through each department, carefully avoiding the eyes of unwelcome salespeople in blue shirts, I slowly realized that the place in the store where I last saw a cordless phone (with answering machine!) had been taken over by iPods, cell phones and another tier of video games.
I was tasered by one of those "I feel old" moments (the innocuous kind, obviously, not the why-won't-this-organ-work? kind), which actually happen quite frequently to someone whose family and wife tell him he was "born at age 52."
I have same-aged and older friends who go without the landline. It sure makes sense for them, but it's just not for me. I don't like the expectation of being so reachable, don't like having a gadget perma-attached to me, and really don't like being in a situation where a game or a text-spat could distract me when a book or quiet contemplation will do.
And when I do actually want to have a decent, heartfelt conversation with a loved one -- particularly from the fortress-like, cell-defying walls of my house -- I like to have it over a reception that won't crackle and potentially drop off or warp their voice like a machine has taken over their person. As it is, phone conversations with my evasive father in the Czech Republic convey more soul fidelity than signal-corrupted conversations with my wife on her way home from work.
In a way, I am a walking yet non-compliant billboard for the cursed telephone monopolies who gouge me with unexplained fees every month. ("$2.23 ... Idiot Consumer Recovery Charge" | "$1.17 ... We Don't Know Either Fee")
I'm not conservative or anti-technology, either. But I do observe that the unending and inevitable advance of technology has pros and cons, and the potential cons are too seldom considered -- or seldom weighed after adoption. The fact that something has been created is not in and of itself reason for adopting it. I'm reminded that early adapters are necessary for beta-testing and product acceptance, but they're often quite irritating, distracted people to be around.
Progression of phone technology and habits, naturally, is not an example of technology-gone-nuclear holocaust on us, but: It's that curmudgeonly observation noted above that encourages me to be selective about which advances I do bother to adopt, and which ones I may comfortably leave behind.
A wee problem has emerged in the LHC super-collider, so the operations that were to commence this fall are now likely to not be resumed until spring. Apparently some of the magnets -- which one imagines are bigger than a three-car garage (but I'm just guessing) -- overheated. That caused a "ton of helium" -- how heavy is helium?!? How much helium is a ton?!? -- to leak into the corridor. Which is a problem.
So the big picture, in layman's layman's terms: the big thing that was the big deal was going to have to go dormant for winter anyway -- in part because the energy required is too great during the peak Swiss heating season. But they were originally going to do more test-drives before winter arrived. Now while they go in for repairs, they won't even get to do anymore fun test-drives.
One of the LHC's eight sectors will now have to be warmed up to well above its operating temperature of 1.9 kelvin (-271C; -456F) – which is colder than deep space – so that repairs can take place.
I'd not previously thought about how one of the issues with running something as close to absolute zero as you can get: whenever you send workers in to fix it, you've got to heat it up first.
The episode provides a lesson in PR, too. Quoth the Don't Worry spokesman:
"If you keep an eye on the big picture, we've been building the machine for 20 years. The switch-on was always going to be a long process," James Gillies, Cern's director of communications, told BBC News.
Well, right, there's that way to see it. But if you keep your other eye on the big picture, you realize they've had 20 years to plan a proper start! So if the switch-on was always likely to include birthing pains, and if you're worried* about people not realizing that when the first hiccups come, you should make that expectation clear to people when you publicize all the kick-off parties.
*I'm not certain that's the case. Since this isn't (yet) a major malfunction/postponement, any publicity and appreciation for the complexity of the project is probably healthy publicity. I'm also not qualified to say. This is just a blog. Everybody's already paid (or committed to payment) for the LCH, so all PR is in the name of keeping the spigot for science turned on, I suppose. The real feeling of good investment vs. waste will come when they tell us if they found cool stuff or not, which is later. I'm done now. Letting it go. Walking away.
This is apropos of nothing. Just something from the "unfinished posts" pile within the blog software, which are not as easy to resume as I wish, but which I want to clear out so they stop staring at me.
I tend to find articles or sites of interest, bookmark them for later when I can write about them ... and then get distracted by other things to learn. With this article, I have no idea what I was originally going to write about, so I'll just do this:
Carl Hiaasen, the writer of hilarious Fletch-ian novels in which a protagonist tackles bad guys and environmental criminals with investigative journalist-like nobility, is a golfer. Naturally, he appears as funny about golf as he is in his novels.
I have at least one friend, plus one wife, who are Hiaasen fans, so they'll appreciate this if they didn't see it when it first printed. If you don't know him, his books are great, quick reads -- good for the beach -- written in a smart way that is perfect antidote for the distressed environmentalist or liberal.
Although this bit about quasi-rationalizing the endless acres we devote to freaking golf courses doesn't pass my completely subjective standards:
An environmentalist, who both in his books and in his weekly column for The Miami Herald has complained a lot about uncontrolled development in Florida, Mr. Hiaasen does take pleasure in the surroundings. He poked for snakes in the rocks, hoping to spot a water moccasin, and pointed out the ibises strolling the fairway, the carp, catfish and tilapia lolling in the lakes.
“The great irony is that golf courses are becoming the last bit of wildlife refuge we have,” he said. “I saw a bobcat on a golf course once, and I don’t know that there’s anyplace else you could do that now.”
There may be some truth in that, but it's a sad statement. And it makes me feel no better about the role that golf courses and luxury isolation developments play in creating overpopulated communities in places that have no natural business hosting that many people who consume that many resources (e.g., much of the southwest), where there is no real access to water without severely stressing the water supply of existing communities, and where there is no realistic understanding of the consequences two decades from now.
I like a little golf, too, but in water-scarce places I can never help feeling that the acres-warped-to-citizen-enjoyment ratio is way out of whack to justify it.
But the point of all this was Hiaasen. He's goooood.
Amusing rendition of the financial crisis, explained in stick-figure dialog. You have to click through the slides via the arrows at the lower left. Poor Norwegian village!
To this point, it's an interesting conversation: the thought (and popular political push) to help foreclosure victims as part of the bailout. Certainly raises the question of exactly what sort of society we wish to run, anyway. And it's fascinating to watch the interplay.
Popularly: "Hey, how come the banks who are in trouble get help, but I don't?" Economically: "Because banks matter, and you don't." Popularly: "Well 'that's capitalism,' they tell me, so why help the banks?" Economically: "Because if the banking system falls, we all fall. But if we prevent the system from failing, only you fall."
At Saturday roller hockey, I overheard a construction worker and a small-biz mortgage broker shout at each other. Eventually they found common ground, agreeing that they're mad as hell at Them and not gonna take it anymore. But they didn't really hear each other, and I don't know what data can be put in front of them to get them to work together.
I think of these sorts of things when someone tells me, "Forget the people who took out mortgages. That's capitalism, baby."
Well it is, and it isn't. Completely unfettered "market" conditions leave a lot of people hurt, while power or wealth accumulates with those who lay on the hurt. Which has always been the cause, throughout this state's history, for creating and revising regulation: To prevent those (people, institutions, whatever) who have access to greater information (through privilege, education, insider access, wealth) from using it to grossly take advantage of those without it.
To the "society we desire" question, presumably we want capitalism to encourage opportunity, innovation and investment to help make life comfortable for all of us. We want regulation to prevent those same gears from making life veeeeery comfortable for the few while screwing many. Inherent in this is recognition that work and sacrifice is still required; that the mythology of American capitalism does not automatically mean a free credit ride for all. But in the politics-for-consumption medium, it is never discussed in these terms. It's always, "Get the government outta my business," vs. "Hey, must be nice that he makes so much more than me."
But philosophically speaking, it's rather evil to have a domestic policy that encourages home ownership (as a means of continuing growth and spending) while creating means and fine print for that home ownership that make the acquisition built on a "house of cards." From the uninformed guy with no credit to the executive suite to the conduct of war, everyone has been encouraged to "risk" and spend without real fear or consequence. Just charge it to the next generation, baby!
I'm not happy that people bought over their head. But I'm no happier that they were encouraged to do so -- and not educated otherwise -- by policy and by (lack of) oversight, all so others could grab short-term gain and our President could keep reassuring us, "The economy is strong and getting stronger."
Just following Krugman alone the last three, four years, the writing of reckoning was on the wall. But while the money is there for the taking ... stay outta the way. Amid Enron and the California energy scam, the red flags about our lack of transparency were there at the highest levels. And by cruel historical coincidence(?), we have this problem festering under an administration that is breathtakingly ill-prepared to deal with it, because it contradicts the upbeat narrative required to enter an insulated circle of yes-men and cronies.
And here we are, in interesting times. Just knew I shouldn't open that fortune cookie.
Step 1: Put your iPod player on random. Step 2: Post the first line from the first 30 songs that play, no matter how embarrassing the song. Step 3: Let everyone guess what song and artist the lines come from. Step 4: Bold the songs when someone guesses correctly. (Looking them up on Google or any other search engine is CHEATING!)
KayO did this, and it was fun for me despite my unfamiliarity with many of the songs (*feels shame*). So I thought I'd try it ... and promptly got carried away. I have so much Killing Joke and Radiohead on my iTunes that I worried it wouldn't work (This is where you say, "You were right: It doesn't.").
So I started removing repeat artists. But then that struck me as cheating, so I left them in ... and spiraled from 30 to 50 songs. So it probably became just a way to entertain myself (You say: "You mean like the rest of your blog?"). I will hint that out of 50 tracks, there are 38 different artists. Further mild hint: Sorry BH -- only one U2 song, and an obscure one at that (but one I suspect you enjoy singing with the lights out, anyway).
Things that might make it worth it: - There are at least a couple that I am "embarrassed" by - More than half are relevant to at least one or another "regular" reader of this site - Standing alone, divorced from tune or context, some lines are just plain funny - I did not cut songs that include the title in their first line, because I figure this is hard enough as it is, and I wasn't sure if that was cheating, too - At least with KayO's, I found it fun to read the first lines as some kind of monkeys-at-typewriters pool of poetry. Kinda feel that way about looking at this one, too. Reading them in sequence makes me guffaw - Also fun: when a line sounds like something you know ... and it turns out to be a song you've never heard in your life
Although I had to look quite a few of these up to decipher or confirm the lyrics, I was struck by how many of these songs were tacked to my bulletin board in college. Apparently I'm very into lyrics.
Right now, I'll leave the list as is. Depending on response (and time), I will probably just return to it and put the titles in white text underneath the song, for revelation by highlighting the text with your cursor. Later*, after eyes have glazed over, I'll add a post to explain why some were "relevant" to specific people if they didn't see/get it, and to sprinkle needed love on independent artists. But please don't feel obliged to play unless it tickles your fancy.
*promises on this blog are rarely kept
The Lines 1. People always talk about / Things they don't know much about / You take your chances and toss them all aside
2. You're alone in the pack / You're feeling like you wanna go home
3. You gotta stomp, whistle and scream / You gotta wiggle all over your dreams
4. One of these days I'm gonna cut you into little pieces.
5. Man watching video, the heart keeps on ticking / He doesn't know why, he's just cattle for slaughter
6. Crazy, sturdy, a tor-pedo / Crazy, brutal, a tor-pedo
7. Aim for the body rare, you'll see it on TV / The worst thing in 1954 was the bikini
8. The king's taken back the throne / The useless seed is sown
9. Signs, signs of loss. Signs disappeared, turned invisible
10. The woman was a dream I had, though rather hard to keep / But when my eyes were watching her as they closed, I was still asleep
11. I never thought I'd die alone / I laugh the loudest -- who'd have known?
12. In the morning I wake up and chase away my dreams, join the world of vertical invention / Every sip of coffee pulls some stitches into seams, tightening the span of my attention
13. Ta-whooit may concern, the power of funk will kick your ass
14. One of these mornings / won't be very long / you will look for me / and baby, I'll be gone
15. Which intelligence gave geometry? Binary systems? Complex cycles of astronomy? / Number proportion, measurement lines, angle mathematics: all appeared overnight
16. Istanbul was Constantinople, now it's Istanbul not Constantinople
17. I woke up alarmed / I didn't know where I was at first -- just that I woke up in your arms / And almost immediately I felt sorry
18. She talks of supernatural aeons in her wake / She says, 'Look behind the wave of changes, feel the future taking shape'
19. I couldn't escape this feeling, with my China girl.
20. Well the time will come when the wind will shout
21. Beg the bee's forgiveness as it's falling from your sleeve / Watch its guts pump poison into sting
22. They love me like I was their brother / They protect me, listen to me
23. The moment I was born, I opened my eyes / Reached out for my credit card
24. I'm waiting till I don't know when / 'Cause I'm sure it's gonna happen then
25. It's too much / that I keep / to myself / And I turn my back on my faith
26. The problem of leisure / What to do for pleasure. / Ideal life: a new purchase / economic circumstances
27. Sweating and bleeding, staring and thinking, sinking deeper in my troubles
28. Once again she steals away, then she reaches out to kiss me
29. My values altered, I was looking for peace / I was tired in the lands of the West -- I had to get out
30. I'm sailing away / Set an open course for the virgin sea
31. The fields of Eden are full of trash / If we beg, borrow or steal, we'll never get them back
32. Take down the walls you see before you, just so the crowd cannot ignore you / You step out toward the solemn faces, awaiting to draw you into places / That they've been before
33. Lemon, see-through in the sunlight / She wore lemon, never in the daylight
34. Oh hurt me baby, I flinch so when you do / Your kisses scourge me, hyssop in your perfume / And 'slave' I only use / As a word to describe the special way / I feel for you
35. How does it feel / To treat me like you do?
36. People I know, places I go, make me feel tongue-tied
37. I am the son and the heir / Of a shyness that is criminally vulgar
38. Rows of houses all bearing down on me
39. We in our infancy, led down shining paths / Shine, shine shining paths, divine our disillusion / Face our imperfections, I begin to wonder / Onion peelings scattered, we've been crying, crying
40. It's not a case of doing what's right / It's just the way I feel that matters
41. It's coming through a hole in the air / From those nights in Tiananmen Square
42. It's as clear, it's as clear, as the maps they drew / Before me and you, when there were no rules
43. Been beat up and battered around / Been set up but I've been shut down
44. You can force it but it will not come / you can taste it but it will not form
45. Confusion in her eyes that says it all: She's lost control And she's clinging to the nearest passerby, she's lost control.
46. Out where the river broke / The bloodwood and the desert oak / Holden wrecks and boiling diesels steam in 45 degrees
47. When we see people, we see people, we see people who are not whole / They have two arms and, they have two legs and / Something is missing and we just don't know -- we can't name it
48. I don't know, just where I'm going / But I'm gonna try for the kingdom if I can / 'Cause it makes me feel like I'm a man
49. I was friendly with this girl who insisted on touching my face / She told outrageous stories, I believed them / Till the endings were changing from endings before / She's not touching me anymore
50. Live, baby, live, now that the day is over / I got a new sensation in perfect moments, impossible to refuse
What a surreal day! Has there been a moment in modern memory when the President and the leaders of both parties were pushing a piece of legislation -- seen as pivotal for our economic well-being -- and it failed to pass because of rebellion in both parties?
Sending a shiver through the globe, the move:
... lowered a fog of uncertainty over economies around the globe. Its authors had described the measure as essential to preventing widespread economic calamity.
The markets began to plummet even before the 15-minute voting period expired on the House floor. For 25 minutes, uncertainty gripped the nation as television showed party leaders trying, and failing, to muster more support.
What's funny -- in a dark comedy way -- is that this moment of crisis comes when all of these U.S. reps are heading back for re-election in six weeks, and this legislation is associated with a very unpopular president. [Wait, haven't they gerrymandered enough so that they don't need to worry about re-election?] So, members were not only pissed that they had to, you know, do the job for which they were elected. They were also pissed that they might have to articulate the reasons for their vote to their constituents. Perish the thought!
In impassioned speeches on the House floor, Democrats and Republicans alike vented their frustration over the nation’s perilous economic condition and the uncomfortable position they were in, facing pressure to approve an unpopular bailout package during an election year, with no guarantee that it would work.
“This is a huge cow patty with a piece of marshmallow stuck in the middle of it and I am not going to eat that cow patty,” said Representative Paul Broun, Republican of Georgia.
“Nobody wants to do this,” said Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, who nonetheless voted for it. “Nobody wants to clean up the mess created by Wall Street recklessness.”
Furthering the irony, there seems to be consensus that some piece of legislation needs to be passed ... so those who voted against it likely thought they were scoring points back at home with their vote -- but without the risk of the measure actually failing. Whoops!
The outcome after a slightly more than 40-minute vote on the House floor left lawmakers almost speechless. Even the strongest opponents of the measure did not expect to prevail, and the leadership of both parties, while increasingly nervous, figured they would squeak out a victory despite a parade of Republicans and Democrats to microphones to assail the measure.
Not that they seem to be proposing a better plan (although one seems to be badly needed). My head spins imagining how this will be recorded in the history books of tomorrow.
As you may have noticed, the site has changed. Sampa, the free-site host, did a version 2 of some sort.
Despite an FAQ that made it sound like allowing one's site to go through v.2 surgery would be okay, there were several flexibilities that surprisingly disappeared with the click of a button. (e.g. I cannot believe sidebars like this one are even narrower than before.)
And I'm told -- miraculously! -- that the conversion cannot be undone. Truth be told, I'm actually quite pissed. But free is free. Sampa has otherwise been good to me.
So I need to sort through site "features" to see how I can make do. Except that I don't have the time at the moment, in the middle of graduate classes and Lighthousehockey.com. (btw, I've removed that Lighthouse RSS feed so that you're not clogged with random Islanders hockey gibberish).
But I promise to touch up the accessories when I get a chance, and return to irregularly scheduled blogging.
Subscribe to this Site
and non-issues she used in the Grand Fight To Not Talk about Actual Policies (But War Records Are Lovely). So I looked at Palin's transcript and noticed that every reference to "nuclear" is spelled out phonetically: "new-clear."
At the in-law abode, I messed with it by lazily shooting hummingbirds at a feeder. Figured those spastic sugar-high wings would be a nice test for the zoom. It's really ridiculous, how digital SLRs have made taken half-way decent photos so easy. I still feel like I'm cheating, with equipment I don't deserve (Why yes, I 
Anyway, a friendly wasp arrived, too, to partake in the sugarfest. Wasps always fascinate me, but lacking the courage, I'm not going to get close enough to really examine one. 
February, 2008